Wisconsin Record
Lake Geneva
Zoning

Swan Creek Supper Club CUP

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (10)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 22, 2026.

Public comments (11)

SupportiveDavid ScotneyJun 22, 2026

The applicant asked for a two-week continuance so he can share final drawings, noting county and driveway approvals are in hand.

Common Council - Jun 22, 2026 · 1:37:20 →
OpposedMillie McCormickJun 8, 2026

President of the Villas of Stone Ridge; not against the supper club but says traffic safety at Center Street is unsolved and suggests connecting to the existing stoplight and a fresh traffic study.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 3:14 →
SupportiveMackenzie BestulJun 8, 2026

Stone Ridge resident of 18 years supporting the project and the Sage Street entrance, saying traffic safety shouldn't be tied to this development.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 6:32 →
SupportiveErin HostJun 8, 2026

Longtime Oakfire employee praising the owner's community generosity and arguing the vacant parcel will be developed by someone either way.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 9:00 →
SupportiveSean PayneJun 8, 2026

Praised the quality of the owners' work turning Scuttlebutts into Oakfire and urged approval.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 12:07 →
SupportiveEileen GreenJun 8, 2026

Lifelong resident and business owner strongly supporting the project, also reading a supporting statement from firefighter-paramedic and Stone Ridge resident Steve Schaefer.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 13:56 →
SupportiveKaren BennettJun 8, 2026

Supports the project; acknowledges safety needs at Center Street but says traffic fixes shouldn't be tied to this development.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 16:35 →
SupportiveDavid ScotneyJun 8, 2026

The applicant described the project vision, the traffic study process, tree preservation, funding of turn lanes, lighting mitigations and the 40-60 jobs the restaurant would create.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 1:08:18 →
SupportiveNick EgerJun 8, 2026

Scotney's attorney argued the parcel is well-suited to the planned business district, the access is lawful and expert-determined, and Act 67 requires substantive evidence for denial or conditions.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 24:30 →
SupportiveRyan CardinalJun 8, 2026

President of Cardinal Engineering explained the traffic study methodology, why Center Street access fails, and DOT/FDM compliance of the Sage Street design.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 27:23 →
SupportiveTony VerrantJun 8, 2026

A Racine County supervisor and land-use planner who called the project an appropriate highest-and-best use and urged approval.

Common Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 33:33 →