Flock ALPR surveillance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 7, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Milwaukee Turners representative called Milwaukee amid a 'surveillance crisis,' citing other Wisconsin cities ending Flock contracts, hacking risks, federal data sharing, and Fourth Amendment concerns.
FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 7, 2026 · 1:34 →Noted FPC cannot cancel contracts (Common Council's role), supported a Flock audit, and urged a community control over police surveillance ordinance to close the governance gap.
FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 7, 2026 · 15:26 →ACLU of Wisconsin organizer detailed contract terminations and controversies in other Wisconsin cities and Dunwoody, Georgia, and Flock's plan to make all cameras video-enabled.
FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 7, 2026 · 19:30 →Cited research on disproportionate camera placement in Black and brown communities and an officer's misuse of Flock to stalk, calling for a full ban and community input.
FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 7, 2026 · 30:09 →Milwaukee Turners mass incarceration coordinator framed surveillance as battlefield tactics against poor and non-white communities and asked the commission to oppose the technology.
FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 7, 2026 · 34:02 →Argued Flock harms outweigh benefits, noting the moratorium on facial recognition could be undone by a software update, and observed officers scratching plates off their own cars.
FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 7, 2026 · 50:19 →Cited 404 Media reporting on federal and ICE access to Flock data and called for community control over police surveillance and removal of Flock from Milwaukee.
FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION — May 7, 2026 · 53:30 →