Nuisance billing notice adequacy at 5716 W Hampton Ave.
Summary
A landlord challenged a $1,711.91 police charge for a search warrant, arguing the notice that just said 'warrant' violated the ordinance's requirement to describe the nuisance. The board majority said the warrant was follow-up on the same robbery, but a dissent warned the city's thin notices waste everyone's time and money — an issue attorney Pflughoeft says recurs across his cases.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 25, 2026.
Impact analysis
The property owner owes $1,711.91 for the warrant response, on top of a conceded February 8 charge.
The city recovers police-response costs and keeps a tool for problem properties.
Property owners facing vague notices bear investigation and legal costs to learn what they're being billed for.
Mentions & discussions (1)
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Milwaukee
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.