We Energies easement compensation and I-94 cost sharing
Summary
Ald. Burgelis objected that We Energies pays 'laughably small' amounts for city easements and that Milwaukee shouldn't contribute any money to the I-94 East-West project given state transportation fees residents already pay. His objections were noted but the items passed.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 23, 2026.
Impact analysis
City shares are small ($5,500 for the I-43 bridge; $17,600 and $1,272 for I-94 items) against millions in state/federal funding.
Utility and highway projects proceed with minimal City cost.
We Energies could lose city revenue and customers, and ratepayers could get stuck with transition costs or service disruptions if the switch is botched.
Mentions & discussions (2)
Milwaukee leaders discuss replacing We Energies
Milwaukee leaders discuss replacing We Energies FOX6 News Milwaukee
COMMON COUNCIL — June 23, 2026
Ald. Burgelis objected that We Energies pays 'laughably small' amounts for city easements and that Milwaukee shouldn't contribute any money to the I-94 East-West project given state transportation fees residents already pay. His objections were noted but the items passed.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Milwaukee
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.