Phil Vetterkind
No biography on file yet.
Want every word Vetterkind has said?
The OpenCity MCP for Claude.ai answers questions like “what has Vetterkind said about housing this year” with one prompt — full speaking history, with YouTube timestamps.
Top issues during term (9)(Environment)
Village of Sussex Emergency Water Interconnect
No cost expected for Pewaukee; Sussex pays for the interconnect.
Battery recycling at DPW center
Well Siting Study
Your water bill and the cost of new development could shift depending on what upgrades or supply sources the plan calls for.
PFAS contamination at the Still River well
The city could face costly water treatment upgrades, testing, or new water sources—costs that may eventually show up on utility bills or in the municipal budget.
Lake Michigan water supply
Test well drilling alone could run about $1.2 million per site, with up to $5 million in hoped-for principal forgiveness on PFOS projects.
Well #8 PFAS Treatment and Well #13 Replacement
The Well #8 treatment project jumped from a $2 million estimate to $3.5 million; low-interest state loans would reduce borrowing costs but grants are unlikely.
PFAS water contamination notice
$3.54 million just for Well #8 — and that cost will ultimately land on water ratepayers.
Storm water compliance and winter salt use
Buying Brookfield treatment credits reduces the number of costly TMDL projects the city must otherwise build.
Drainage and flooding at N17 W25010 Bluemound Road
Decisions during term (0)
Recorded while Vetterkind was in office — not necessarily decisions they moved, spoke to, or voted on.
No decisions found matching Environment.
Voting record (0)(Environment)
No votes found matching Environment.